- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:07:52 -0500
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:56 +0000, Dave Pawson wrote: > E.g. 6.13.4 fo:wrapper > > Contents: > > (#PCDATA|%inline;|%block;)* > > Crudely, is > <fo:wrapper> Plain text <fo:inline> .....</ </ > Compliant to the rec? The "content" is intended to be a DTD content model for the element. #PCDATA matches text, of course, as in an XML DTD, and if you follow the link from %inline; you'll get to http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/#inline.fo.list in which we see that fo:inline is included, so yes, <fo:wrapper> Plain test <fo:inline>.....</fo:inline> </fo:wapper> is fine. The notation used is described in 6.2, "Formatting Object Content", http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/#d0e6532 Although DTDs are less commonly used these days, they're still very much part of XML of course. Do you think that it'd be clearer if we used some other notation for 2.0? Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 21:07:58 UTC