Re: lengths, typo?

On 09/07/07, Robert Slover <Robert.Slover@jdsu.com> wrote:

> I am not sure what your final question means (and have no authority to
> answer it if I did), but I doubt the mention of ex height is a typo.  It
> is a typographic term
Yes, a term which was there in earlier editions of the spec, seemingly gone
in all but one place in the current edition.


Hence the query if it's a remnant of former days.

regards
-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk