- From: Christian Geisert <christian.geisert@isu-gmbh.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:38:08 +0200
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3c.org
Sebastian Rahtz schrieb: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:22:17AM -0400, Cindy Hunt wrote: > >>I have heard RenderX's XEP product mentioned a lot and I was >>wondering if any of you more seasoned XSL-FO developers could tell me >>what the advantages of using it are. > > I don't think there is any mystery. XEP is a more mature > product, supporting more of the XSL FO spec than FOP. That > is not to say that FOP will not one day implement all > the missing bits, but as of now XEP is definitely > more production-ready. XEP and Antenna House formatters > are the leading implementations, and are unfortunately > both commercial. However, they also both give access > to versions you can use to assess them, so you can try > them without commitment. And what about PassiveTeX ;-) Christian
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 14:39:14 UTC