- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:21:00 +0100
- To: Cindy Hunt <Cindy.Hunt@sas.com>
- Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3c.org
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 10:22:17AM -0400, Cindy Hunt wrote: > > I have heard RenderX's XEP product mentioned a lot and I was > wondering if any of you more seasoned XSL-FO developers could tell me > what the advantages of using it are. I don't think there is any mystery. XEP is a more mature product, supporting more of the XSL FO spec than FOP. That is not to say that FOP will not one day implement all the missing bits, but as of now XEP is definitely more production-ready. XEP and Antenna House formatters are the leading implementations, and are unfortunately both commercial. However, they also both give access to versions you can use to assess them, so you can try them without commitment. -- Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 11:24:52 UTC