Re: PDF bookmarks (was: Re: extensions to FO)

David Carlisle writes:
 > tree. If some sections for example need a different page layout
 > then don't I have to change to a new page maste at rather a high level
 > in the FO tree, but I may not want to reflect that in the section
 > nembering or bookmarks (that is, I may want the sections to "logically"
 > be siblings even if they are in different page sequences.)

I very much support David here. PDF bookmarks are a useful facility,
and we should not be limiting their use to TOCs which simply reflect the
document.

Sebastian