- From: Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 08:24:28 +0000
- To: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
At 11:44 PM 2/3/01, you wrote: >How about this as a compromise: > >Add a custom attribute to fo:wrapper to denote an outline entry. e.g. > ><fo:wrapper pdf:outline-label="Section 1"> > <fo:block>Section 1</fo:block> > <fo:wrapper pdf:outline-label="Subsection 1.1"> > <fo:block>Subsection 1.1</fo:block> > </fo:wrapper> ></fo:wrapper> > >Then we get a spec-compliant solution with no loose interpretation of the >xslt tree bit, and we don't overload the fo:marker with an additional use. And its partly clear that this is pdf specific, i.e. won't do much with a ps output. If a processor were going to postscript, is the single attribute on the wrapper enough to say 'forget it'? DaveP
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 03:26:12 UTC