- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:16:58 -0700
- To: "Elliotte Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: <www-xpath-comments@w3.org>
It is unlikely that there is much value is fixing such a small editorial problem in XPath 1.0. Most of our resources are currently being used to work on XPath 2.0. /paulc Chair, XML Query WG Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: www-xpath-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xpath-comments- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Elliotte Harold > Sent: June 22, 2005 12:29 PM > To: www-xpath-comments@w3.org > Subject: Grammatical erratum in XPath spec > > > Section 4.2 says, > > The string-length returns the number of characters in the string (see > [3.6 Strings]). If the argument is omitted, it defaults to the context > node converted to a string, in other words the string-value of the > context node. > > That should be > > The string-length function returns the number of characters in the > string (see [3.6 Strings]). If the argument is omitted, it defaults to > the context node converted to a string, in other words the string-value > of the context node. > > i.e. add the word "function" > > -- > Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu > XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! > http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 05:17:05 UTC