W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xpath-comments@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0

From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:32:31 +0100
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E6210622B8D6@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: "'DPawson@rnib.org.uk'" <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>, xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com, xsl-editors@w3.org
Cc: www-xpath-comments@w3.org
I'll take the liberty of forwarding this one to www-xpath-comments, since it
affects the XPath specification and not XSLT.

We first have to decide whether we want both the operators currently written
as "<<" and "precedes". Then we have to decide how to spell them.

Mike Kay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DPawson@rnib.org.uk [mailto:DPawson@rnib.org.uk]
> Sent: 09 January 2002 11:02
> To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com; xsl-editors@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0
> 
> 
> Evan wrote: 
> > Does anyone on this list care that "<<", when used in XSLT, 
> > would have to be
> > written as "a&lt;&lt;b"?
> 
> Yes. It stinks and is distinctly unreadable.
> 
> If its document order why not keywords such as before, after
> or some such. 
> 
> Regards DaveP
> 
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 07:46:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:05:54 GMT