Right. Thanks. Graham Johnson wrote: > > The statement in section 2.5 (immediately above the "NOTE:") that reads: > "div//para is short for div/descendant-or-self::node()/child::para " > should read: > "div//para is short for child::div/descendant-or-self::node()/child::para " > (In a previous paragraph, it was stated that > "div/para is short for child::div/child::para.") > > Graham K Johnson > gjohnson@achieve.com > Java Software Engineer > Achieve Communications, Inc. > Broomfield, COReceived on Friday, 14 April 2000 04:29:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:05:53 GMT