W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xpath-comments@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: Request for clarification

From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 09:32:19 +0700
Message-ID: <379BC8B3.8E3B48F@jclark.com>
To: keshlam@alum.mit.edu
CC: www-xpath-comments@w3.org

"Joseph Kesselman, yclept Keshlam" wrote:
 
> Does the XPath syntax formally replace the syntax previously proposed in
> the XPointer drafts? 

Yes.

> I haven't found a clear statement that the old
> XPointer syntax has become obsolete...

The current XPointer WD (http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xptr) seems pretty
clear on this to me.

James

Received on Sunday, 25 July 1999 22:33:47 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Olivier Corby: "XPath WD"
Previous message: Joseph Kesselman, yclept Keshlam: "Request for clarification"
In reply to: Joseph Kesselman, yclept Keshlam: "Request for clarification"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:05:53 GMT