W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > January 2007

FW: "validation" of xi:fallback in xinclude

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:33:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302062DB7CD@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Erik Wilde" <dret@berkeley.edu>

[Forwarding to the xinclude comments list--paul]

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wilde
Sent: Saturday, 2007 January 27 21:07
Subject: "validation" of xi:fallback in xinclude


hello.

i am currently implementing xinclude, and i ran across the following
issue: in paragraph 2 of section 3.2, it says very clearly: "It is a
fatal error for an xi:fallback  element to appear in a document
anywhere other than as the direct child of the xi:include. It is a
fatal error for the xi:fallback element to contain any elements from
the XInclude namespace other than xi:include."

to me, this is a pretty clear statement, so i implemented it like
that. when running the test cases, however, i failed one and was
wondering what was happening. the test data led to the mail archive
and then i found that later in section 3.2 there there is the new
text: "The content of xi:fallback elements are ignored unless a
resource error occurs while processing the surrounding xi:include
element. In particular, apparent fatal errors caused by the presence,
absence, or content of elements and attributes inside the xi:fallback
element must not be reported in xi:fallback elements that are ignored."

i think that the wording of this section is rather
unfortunate. statements should be combined to not contradict each
other, right now paragraph 2 contradicts paragraph 4.

kind regards,

erik wilde   tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
       dret@berkeley.edu  -  http://dret.net/netdret
       UC Berkeley - School of Information (iSchool)
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:35:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 31 January 2007 17:35:05 GMT