W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > September 2005

Re: nist-include-40 & nist-include-39

From: Bill Han <bill.han@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:19:13 -0700
Message-ID: <4331CE51.7040903@oracle.com>
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
CC: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@tkachenko.com>, Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org

This has nothing to do with xi:fallback. I am talking about the content 
model for xi:include.

<elem/> is allowed under <xi:include>? Then, how do you interpret 
<!ELEMENT xi:include (xi:fallback?)> ?

xi:fallback is okay, b/c the spec says <!ELEMENT xi:fallback ANY>.

- Bill

Elliotte Harold wrote:

> Bill Han wrote:
>
>> Could you point me where the spec says?
>> How to interpret <!ELEMENT xi:include (xi:fallback?)> ?
>>
>
> What's your confusion here? Unless I'm missing something obvious, this 
> is a pretty straight-forward case. The include is resolved.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xinclude-20041220/#fallback_element
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2005 21:19:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Wednesday, 21 September 2005 21:19:40 GMT