Frederik De Keukelaere wrote: > Thank you for your response. I got the libxml2 to work with the example now. > However the output(see below) of the inclusion seems to be invalid because > it contains duplicate ids. Is this output valid according to XInclude, I > thought the specification required XInclude processors to solve this? Nope, XInclude spec says nothing about fixing duplicate IDs in result infoset. Take a look also at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-xinclude-comments/2004Mar/0004 -- Oleg Tkachenko http://blog.tkachenko.comReceived on Monday, 6 June 2005 11:41:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:16:10 GMT