W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > July 2004

RE: minor remark regarding appendix c

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:09:39 -0700
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA20435AADB@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Erik Wilde" <net.dret@dret.net>, <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>

The Working Group agrees with you.  In the next publication, we'll note
[include history] and [language] as exceptions to infoset "sameness" in
each of the examples in Appendix C.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-xml-xinclude-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-xml-xinclude-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Erik Wilde
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:09 AM
> To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
> Subject: minor remark regarding appendix c
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> hello.
> 
> in the xinclude cr document, appendix c uses the phrase "The infoset
> resulting from resolving inclusions on this document is the same as
that
> of the following document" for examples 1 through 4. as i understand
it,
> the [language] property is optional, but the [include history]
property
> is mandatory. so, technically speaking, the infoset of the
serialization
> is not the (exact) same as that of the resolved inclusion. at least
> that's what i think...
> 
> cheers,
> 
> erik wilde  -  tel:+41-1-6325132  -  fax:+41-1-6321035
>   mailto:net.dret@dret.net  -  http://dret.net/netdret
>   computer engineering and networks laboratory   (tik)
>   swiss federal institute of technology, zurich (ethz)
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 18:09:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:16:10 GMT