- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 12:35:16 -0600
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 12:23, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > The Core WG decided to add some explanation about why the split was > made. Good... > Here is my first draft of this text (suggestions welcome): > > <note> > <p>For interoperability, fragment identifiers <termref > def="dt-must">should not</termref> be used; the interpretation and > application of media-specific fragment identifiers in creating > info-items is not guaranteed to be supported across implementations. > For <att>parse="xml"</att> inclusions, sub-resources are identified by a > separate <att>xpointer</att> attribute instead of by a fragment > identifier. A separate attribute is necessary because a fragment > identifier is interpreted according to the media type of the returned > resource, while the <att>xpointer</att> attribute is applied after the > resource has been cast to application/xml.</p> > </note> Hmm... no pointer to nor excerpt from http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#identification. Can I please have one? Perhaps I'll find time to craft a specfici textual selection presently. > Sorry for the delay in responding Understandable; no harm done. > > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 17:16, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > Regarding... > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xinclude-20031110/ > > After discussion with the TAG > > http://www.w3.org/2003/11/15-tag-summary.html#xincl > > I've changed my mind... > > > "A URI SHOULD be assigned to each resource that is intended to be > > > identified, shared, or described by reference." > > > > > > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#identification > > > > > > If a URI has been assigned to a resource, Web agents SHOULD refer to > the > > > resource using the same URI, character for character. > > > -- http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#identifiers-comparison > > > > > > which is basically: to refer from one thing to > > > another in the Web, use URI reference syntax. > > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 13:35:17 UTC