- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:11:13 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
At 4:34 PM -0800 2/25/04, Jonathan Marsh wrote: >The WG felt that the value of the attribute should be placed in the HTTP >header without augmentation. I've changed the wording from "should >include the value in the HTTP header" to "should place the value in the >HTTP header" to help clear up this ambiguity. > I accept your intent here. I'm still not convinced the language is sufficiently clear though. "should include" or "should place" sound the same to me. Neither seems to prohibit adding other values as well. I suggest "should be" as in, "The value of the accept-language header should be the same as the value of the accept-language attribute" and ideally I'd like to add "and should not include any other languages not included in the accept-language attribute" -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 16:26:41 UTC