RE: Comments for WD-xinclude-20031110

Thank you for these comments.  I have reflected their acceptance in the latest editor's draft.  More details below.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-xml-xinclude-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xml-xinclude-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Susan Lesch
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 9:42 PM
> To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Comments for WD-xinclude-20031110
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> These are just quick minor editorial comments for the XInclude Last
> Call [1] references sections.
> 
> 1. The editors' names are links. The title of the work should really be
> the link instead. Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote a Bibliography
> Extractor [2] that might help, and the Manual of Style has an example
> entry [3].

This looks like a production problem.  I see it on the public draft but not on my editor's drafts.  I'll be vigilant to make sure whatever went wrong doesn't occur again.

> 2. Also I wondered why Unicode Version 3.2 is cited by number. The
> Unicode Consortium has citation guidelines near the bottom of [4].

It should be a generic reference to Unicode.  I copied the Unicode reference verbatim from the new XML 1.1 Rec.

> 3. The IRI Internet-Draft's title (rather than its URI) should be the
> link.

Fixed.

> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xinclude-20031110/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-biblio-ui
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section
> [4] http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/
> 
> Happy New Year and best wishes for your project,
> --
> Susan Lesch           http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/
> mailto:lesch@w3.org               tel:+1.858.483.4819
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)    http://www.w3.org/
>

Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 11:48:24 UTC