W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org > February 2004

RE: URI vs IRI in XInclude spec

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:33:09 -0800
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA2028867EF@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Richard Tobin" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>

Fixed in two places, section 3.1 and 4. Colloquial use of URI in the
introduction, and terms such as "relative URI" and "base URI" are left
unchanged.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-xml-xinclude-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-xml-xinclude-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Tobin
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:04 AM
> To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org
> Subject: URI vs IRI in XInclude spec
> 
> 
> In section 3.1, the href attribute is described as a URI reference.
It
> should
> be IRI reference, as in section 4.1.
> 
> Other uses of "URI" should really be checked too.
> 
> -- Richard
> 
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2004 11:33:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:16:09 GMT