- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:13:05 -0500
- To: www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
duerst@w3.org (Martin Duerst) writes: >I think the first paragraph is fine. I don't like the references >to specific products at the start of the second paragraph. > >What about changing the first sentence of the second paragraph to: > >A raw XML version, an SVG version, an XSL-FO version, and an XHTML >version of the same content, as well as different versions in >different languages, all potentially using the same ID values, >can easily be obtained with mechanisms like HTTP content negotiation. That all sounds fine to me. Tim Bray requested some other changes, so maybe we end up at: ------------------- A raw XML version, an SVG version, an XSL-FO version, and an XHTML version of the same content, as well as different versions in different languages, all identified with the same URI and potentially supporting identical fragment identifiers, can easily be obtained as representations of the same resource because of mechanisms like HTTP content negotiation. ------------------- That may need an edit for sentence length, but I hope it's mutually acceptable. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 16:12:00 UTC