RE: Architectural problems of the XInclude CR from Jonathan Marsh on 2003-01-10 (www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org from January 2003)

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:46:06 -0800
To: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
Cc: <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <330564469BFEC046B84E591EB3D4D59C08D1D4C5@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

The XML Core WG accepted this portion of your comments.  The other parts
are still under discussion.

At 4:48 PM +0900 12/27/02, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

> 2) XInclude uses text/xml rather than application/xml
>
> Most XMLers prefer application/xml to text/xml, since XML documents
> are not readable by casual users (see RFC 3023).  Some people even
> propose to drop text/xml.  I believe that application/xml should be
> used, even if my first comment is turned down.

Received on Thursday, 9 January 2003 19:46:39 UTC