- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:27:51 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org>
At 1:46 PM -0700 8/15/01, Jonathan Marsh wrote: >Thanks for the comment; please accept our apologies for taking so long >to resolve this issue. > >We agree that inclusion of a top-level element is underspecified, and >will update the draft to indicate that a top-level include element can >only be replaced by a combination of zero or more comment nodes, zero or >more processing instructions, and zero or one element nodes. > zero or one element nodes? Wouldn't you want exactly one element node? Or am I missing something? -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 19:35:37 UTC