W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2013

[Bug 20863] New: Union types : "zero or more" vs. "one or more" data types

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:28:59 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20863-703@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20863

            Bug ID: 20863
           Summary: Union types : "zero or more" vs. "one or more" data
                    types
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
          Assignee: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
          Reporter: ghislain.fourny@28msec.com
        QA Contact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
                CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com

The following paragraph 2.4.1. mentions that union types are the union of "one
or more other datatypes":

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#atomic-vs-list

While the definition of such types allow for "zero or more" (which allows
"user-defining" xs:error):

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#union-datatypes

Did I just miss something, or could it be a typo in paragraph 2.4.1.?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 14:29:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 February 2013 14:29:05 GMT