W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2012

[Bug 16080] Why does XSD 1.1 part 1 cite XSD 1.0 2E normatively?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:15:07 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1SDQQl-0001ys-9H@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16080

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #8 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2012-03-30 01:15:06 UTC ---
The change mentioned in comment 6 has also been made.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 01:15:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:12 UTC