W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: <time> values in HTML5

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:43:55 +0000
To: liam@w3.org
Cc: tantek@cs.stanford.edu, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, public-html-xml@w3.org
Message-ID: <20111203164355.68634f26@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:13:01 -0500
Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:

> I was originally hoping that e.g. an RFC822 timestamp would be
> supported, as that's a stable, well-documented and widely used format
> for timestamps and seemed sensible for use in HTML (the ISO style is
> obviously better for i18n but we already have that).

Well, actually this date format did change in one of the documents that
obsoleted RFC822. The change was to replace two digit years with four
digit ones.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Saturday, 3 December 2011 19:55:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 3 December 2011 19:55:41 GMT