W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2011

[Bug 14820] Implementation-defined features checklist

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:03:58 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RWWWk-0005TC-OF@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14820

David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needsDrafting

--- Comment #4 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2011-12-02 17:03:56 UTC ---
Proposal: 
(1) accept MK's change to the wording (possibly modulo xsd:string).

(from the original comment)
XSD 1.1 depends on other specifications for the definitions of some data types
such as xs:NCName and the definition of whitespace. Although all current
editions of [XML 1.0], [XML 1.1], [Namespaces in XML 1.0], and [XML Namespaces
1.1] have identical definitions of these constructs, future editions could
introduce changes. Implementations may support either the definitions in the
current specifications, or definitions in future specifications that supersede
them, or both.
[this wording leaves out a crucial bit concerning xs:string.]

 (2) Add a Note to say that the mapping from the XML character sequence to the
infoset which serves as input to the validator is, strictly speaking, not
constrained by this spec, so either the 1.0 mapping or the 1.1 mapping can be
used by a conforming processor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 17:04:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 December 2011 17:04:01 GMT