- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:58:36 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13935 --- Comment #5 from Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> 2011-10-07 15:58:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Change section 3.1.4 to delete or rephrase second paragraph, in such a way so > as to allow XPath expressions to address PIs and comments. I think, it would be nice that having PIs and comments in the XDM instance for assertions could be made implementation defined. i.e the spec may allow implementations not to have (and vice-versa, i.e to have) PIs and comment in the XDM instance for assertions. And we could change this particular test case, to introduce a new version token like following: <expected validity="invalid" version="with-comments-and-PI"/> <expected validity="valid" version="without-comments-and-PI"/> (similar to the version tokens introduced for CTA like, <expected validity="valid" version="full-xpath-in-CTA"/> <expected validity="invalid" version="restricted-xpath-in-CTA"/> ) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 15:58:37 UTC