[Bug 11354] Mentions of "override" outside of the override section

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11354

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #6 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-03-08 00:04:43 UTC ---
>"Since the overridden source declaration is overridden, 
it isn't used to try to create or identify any components, so its errors 
do not need to stand in the way of identifying the schema to be used
in validating the document.".

Oh dear, ghastly thought. Suppose someone writes

<xs:element name="abc" type="!!**!!**!!**!!"/>

and then overrides this. Is the processor actually not allowed to report an
error?

I would resist such an interpretation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2011 00:04:46 UTC