- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:48:48 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10662
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needsDrafting |needsReview
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2011-02-01 17:48:48 UTC ---
A wording proposal intended to resolve this issue is now at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b10662.html
(W3C member only link)
The main innovation is that it defines a class of terms (ENTITY value, ID
value, etc.) which can be used to describe the relevant constraints more
consistently, more briefly, and the editors hope more clearly.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 17:48:50 UTC