W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2011

[Bug 12185] Conditional Type Assignment and substitutability

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:11:20 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QSW1w-0002XT-L5@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #15 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-06-03 15:11:18 UTC ---
re "4.6 S.{type table} is ·equivalent· to G.{type table}, if either ·present·."

I find it hard to swallow a statement that something that doesn't exist can
have properties and relationships, such as equivalence to something else that
doesn't exist.

The statement works if "S.{type table}" is a reference to the property, but
usually in our specs "S.{type table}" is a reference to the value of the
property. The properties are equivalent but the type tables aren't, because
there are no type tables. I prefer Sandy's wording.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 15:11:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:11 UTC