W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [Bug 12300] move precisionDecimal to a Note

From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:42:58 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB73C62.6000102@saxonica.com>
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
On 26/04/2011 19:27, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12300
>
> C. M. Sperberg-McQueen<cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>  changed:
>
>             What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Keywords|needsDrafting               |needsReview
>
> --- Comment #1 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen<cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>  2011-04-26 18:27:45 UTC ---
> A three-part wording proposal intended to resolve this issue is on the server
> at
>
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.b12300.html
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b12300.html
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/pD/precisionDecimal.html
>    (all links member-only)
>
In Part 2, the precisionDecimal row needs to be deleted from the table 
in 4.1.5

In Part 1, in 3.13.4.2, the Note relating to precisionDecimal appears to 
be present in both deleted and undeleted forms. Similarly the reference 
to Chamberlain 2006.

The draft Note appears to have lost all discussion of how 
precisionDecimal might work in assertions given the absence of XPath 
support for the type. (That is, the material semi-deleted from Part 1).

Michael Kay
Saxonica
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:43:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 April 2011 21:43:28 GMT