W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2011

[Bug 2753] wd-27: Errors in component diagram

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:57:36 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Q6lDk-0006tP-0V@jessica.w3.org>

David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
           Keywords|editorial                   |decided
                 CC|                            |David_E3@VERIFONE.com

--- Comment #5 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2011-04-04 14:57:33 UTC ---
I made the following changes to the diagram, approved by Mary, so this item
becomes "decided".

> No annotations anywhere (I think this is probably OK, but
> we should say something in the verbiage about it)
[DE] added

> No names for named components anywhere: should be
> a property, no?
[DE] already fixed.

> Open Content?
[DE] shown as an association (property records seem a bridge too far).

> Schema:
>      missing link to identity constraint definitions
[DE] already fixed.

> Simple type definition:
>     facets are components, not properties
>          Facet component has properties fixed and value
[DE] done.

>         hmmm... but the value property for the assertion facet is an
> assertion,
>        so maybe you need a link as well?
[DE] decided not to show the link from facet to assertion, but did add an
Assertion component.

>     item type definition, where?
>     member type definitions, where?
>     primitive type definition, where?
[DE] added as properties.

>     context, where?
[DE] already done.

> Complex type definition:
>     base type definition, where?
>     context, where?
[DE] already done.

> Attribute group definition
>     missing from top part of diagram entirely
>     (attribute uses, attribute wildcard)
[DE] already done.

> Model group definition, likewise
[DE] already done.

> Element Declaration
>       points to a CTA, which should be a Type Table
>           Type Table needs links to default type definition and to
> alteratives
>              alternatives are Type Alternative component with property
> test
> and link to
>             type definition
[DE] opted to keep consistent with property record treatment and make a

>       scope, where?
[DE] ditto.

>       substitution group affiliations should be link to components, not
> a
> property
[DE] done.
> Identity Constraint Definition
>      referenced key should be link to component, not a property
[DE] already done.

> Assertions
>     missing test property
[DE]  added.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 14:57:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:11 UTC