W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2010

[Bug 11335] Inappropriate use of MAY in 2.4.1.1

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:22:43 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PIsGx-0005eU-Bf@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11335

Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davep@iit.edu

--- Comment #3 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2010-11-18 00:22:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)

> My reading of "No X may have a Y" is "There must not be an X that has a Y" -
> that is, it is a prescriptive statement, not a permissive one.

That's the way I read it, too.  And I agree that RFC2119 prefers "MUST NOT" to
"MAY not", even if they technically mean the same thing.  (But since they mean
the same thing, it's truly a minor editorial fix.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 00:22:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 18 November 2010 00:22:47 GMT