W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2010

[Bug 11336] Permitted usage of xs:anyAtomicType

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:32:07 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PIrTz-0003WT-US@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11336

Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gandhi.mukul@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com> 2010-11-17 23:32:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)

I think this bug report is related to the bug
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11335 you've opened.

> We don't allow a user-defined type to be derived by restriction from
> xs:anyAtomicType.

In the bug 11335 my opinion is to retain the qualifier MAY for this feature. So
as per my understanding we must not say for e.g "we *don't* allow" (since MAY
is specifying a lax implementation behavior).

> But we do allow a user-defined type to be derived by restriction from
> union(xs:anyAtomicType, xs:integer), or even from union(xs:anyAtomicType) (a
> singleton union), which appears to have exactly the same semantics.
> 
> This seems inconsistent...

If we retain MAY for the point I've mentioned above, then the above examples
shall be allowable as well.

> I cannot see any reason for allowing xs:anyAtomicType (or xs:anySimpleType) to
> appear as a member type of a union or as an item type of a list.

Again an MAY qualifier allows implementers to have a lax implementation (and
ideally be implementation defined) in this regard.

Summarizing: I don't see these issues as significant design hole in the spec at
the moment, so I'm in favor of keeping the status-quo.

But I'll be fine with the eventual decision of the WG about this bug report and
the bug 11335.

Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 23:32:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 17 November 2010 23:32:13 GMT