W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2010

[Bug 11103] New: Note in section 2.4.1 (Special datatypes as members of a union)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:42:30 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11103-703@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: Note in section 2.4.1 (Special datatypes as members of
                    a union)
           Product: XML Schema
           Version: 1.1 only
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
        AssignedTo: David_E3@VERIFONE.com
        ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
         QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
                CC: cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com

Section 2.4.1 contains the Note

 It is a consequence of constraints normatively specified elsewhere in this
document that any ·primitive· or ·ordinary· datatype may occur among the
·member types· of a ·union·. (In particular, ·union· datatypes may themselves
be members of ·unions·, as may ·lists·.) The only prohibition is that no
·special· datatype may be a member of a ·union·.

It would be helpful to the reader to have a pointer to where "elsewhere" is. In
fact it's remarkably hard to find the rule that bans special datatypes from
participating in a union (if it were easier, I suspect the editor would have
included a link).

(and the same is probably also true of the previous note concerning lists).

For unions, seeking such a constraint:

* Section says, in the introductory prose, "Any number (zero or more)
of ordinary or ·primitive· ·datatypes· can participate in a ·union· type." (But
it doesn't actually say that special datatypes can't).

* says nothing

* 4.1.1 says nothing

* 4.1.5 says nothing

Is there anywhere else I should have looked?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 08:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:10 UTC