W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2010

[Bug 6155] Data Types Should Provide Re-Format Facet

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:52:26 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NuHdq-0004gS-Ce@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6155


Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davep@iit.edu
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED




--- Comment #8 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu>  2010-03-24 03:52:25 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Whould the time be right to revive this one?

No.  By making the STATUS LATER, the working group is saying that it isn't able
(in this case, time-wise, among other things) to consider this now, even though
it sounds like an interesting idea that we'd like to see continued.  In point
of fact, the working group is trying desperately to get version 1.1 closed out;
the only thing we're worrying about are bugs and errors at this point.

Michael Kay said in comment #1:

> Therefore we propose to close it with the disposition "Later" which will make
> it a candidate for including in the requirements for a future release.

Michael is correct; the next iteration of the working group should go through
all comments that are marked LATER and consider them.

He then said:

> If you are content with this resolution, please mark the issue "Closed";
> otherwise, please explain with further justification why this needs to be done
> now.

This ultimately lead to your comment #4; it appears that that got lost in the
subsequent discussion about regular expressions, and  no one responded to your
question.  Let me do so now:

(In reply to comment #4)
> Well, you may think I'm stupid, but the radio button list below this text field
> box reads "resolution" several times and isn't orthogonal at all. I don't want
> to make a mistake: How do I actually set the *status* of this bug and not the
> *resolution*?

Fear not.  Clicking the CLOSE button will "Mark bug as CLOSED" in its STATUS
field.  It won't affect the RESOLUTION field.  Right now the STATUS is
RESOLVED, the RESOLUTION is LATER.  If you click the CLOSE button, you'll cause
the STATUS to change from RESOLVED to CLOSED, the RESOLUTION will remain LATER.

Given that this has been sitting so long, I'm taking the liberty of closing it
on your behalf.  I will verify that indeed the RESOLUTION remains LATER.  If
this is not satisfactory, please REOPEN the bug.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:52:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:52:30 GMT