- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:35:27 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6204
Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords| |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-03-16 13:35:26 ---
During its 2009-03-13 telecon, the schema WG adopted a proposal to address this
issue.
The change is to replace the "Type Definition Hierarchy" definition:
"[Definition:] Except for ·xs:anyType·, every ·type definition· is, by
construction, either a ·restriction· or an ·extension· of some other type
definition. The graph of these relationships forms a tree known as the Type
Definition Hierarchy."
with the following:
"[Definition:] Except for ·xs:anyType·, every ·type definition· is, by
construction, either a ·restriction· or an ·extension· of some other type
definition. The exception ·xs:anyType· is a ·restriction· of itself. With the
exception of the loop on ·xs:anyType·, the graph of these relationships forms a
tree known as the Type Definition Hierarchy with ·xs:anyType· as its root."
With this change, the WG believes that the issue raised in this bug report is
fully addressed. I'm marking this RESOLVED accordingly.
Frans, as the persons who opened and reopened this issue, if you would indicate
your concurrence with or dissent from the WG's disposition of the comment by
closing or reopening the issue, we'll be grateful. If we don't hear from you in
the next two weeks, we'll assume that silence implies consent.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 13:35:36 UTC