W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2009

Erratum for lexical representation for positiveInteger

From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:36:09 -0700
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB4046017.AB029986-ON8825757A.0081400E-8825757A.00819654@ca.ibm.com>
In [1], the description of positiveInteger says optional + then any number 
of [0-9].

Shouldn't it be optional +, any number of zeroes, a [1-9], then any number 
of [0-9]? 

As described, positiveInteger seems to permit 0.

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/datatypes.html#positiveInteger

Thanks,
John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com 

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Blog RSS feed: 
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2009 23:36:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:50:09 UTC