- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:08:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6545 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2009-02-10 17:08:45 --- I think I prefer the solution of an empty <xs:group/> element to one with an artificial invented name, though I wouldn't object to something like <xs:group ref="#baseModel"/> I think that the current rules cause assertions to be inherited - no problems there. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 17:08:54 UTC