- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:39:55 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6522 --- Comment #17 from John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> 2009-02-06 19:39:54 --- (In reply to comment #16) > > 3) add a further comment that gives the following sort of information > > "this namespace is provided to make it easy for other specifications to > > reference the datatypes. > > Can someone explain why one "address" for the datatypes is easier to use to > reference the datatypes than the other? It doesn't, of course. But in version 1.0, it was put in with that as the stated purpose, and other specifications have indeed used it for that very purpose. Yanking it now makes no sense. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 February 2009 19:54:12 UTC