- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:41:02 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6522
Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |petexmldev@codalogic.com
--- Comment #6 from Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com> 2009-02-04 10:41:02 ---
I have to confess I'm very much in the: (c) huh? what are you talking about?
camp!
But do we really need a convincing story in XSD about the differences between
the two namespace in order just to preserve the
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes namespace when it doesn't really add
value to XSD itself and represents just another element of confusion for the
reader? Can't we say something along the lines of:
"For historical reasons the namespace
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes is reserved as an alias of
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema when referring to XSD datataypes so that it
may be used by other specifications to refer to the data types defined herein,
such that blah-di-blah." ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 10:41:19 UTC