- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:49:48 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6465 --- Comment #1 from Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com> 2009-01-22 17:49:48 --- The following is Sandy's response in (member-only): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2009Jan/0042.html For [inherited attributes], I don't think we need to perform the same fixup. They are just references to other information items, just like the [parent] property points to the parent element. The key point is that members of the [inherited attributes], unlike defaulted ones, are *not* members of the [attributes]. But I do agree that when it comes to constructing a DTM for CTA, namespace bindings are needed, because [inherited attributes] are considered part of [attributes] at that point. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 17:49:56 UTC