- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:40:36 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6021 --- Comment #6 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> 2009-01-16 17:40:35 --- The WG approved the base proposal for 6021: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b6021.html With instructions for the editors to carefully consider the following comments from Michael Kay and Noah Mendelsohn: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2009Jan/0013.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2009Jan/0015.html A further late-breaking comment from Sandy (it's not clear whether there was consensus to consider it): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2009Jan/0018.html Editorial proposals to be decided by WBS by COB Tuesday: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.ep29.html (optional) http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.ep29k.html http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.ep30.html -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 17:40:47 UTC