[Bug 6943] Minor editorial issue: nontimezoned or untimezoned

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6943


Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |davep@iit.edu




--- Comment #1 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu>  2009-05-22 15:46:10 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Section "3.3.8.2 Lexical Mapping" for "dateTime" introduces notions like
> "timezoned" and "untimezoned" values, but later on the "3.3.10 date" section
> uses the word "nontimezoned". Should be consistent.

Formal recommendation to the WG:  In 3.3.8.2, first paragraph, change the two
occurrences of 'nontimezoned' to 'untimezoned'.

These appear to be the only two occurrences of 'nontimezoned' in the spec.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 15:46:20 UTC