http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 --- Comment #1 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2009-05-21 17:37:45 --- (In reply to comment #0) > Given that we are talking about the "time" type, seems it should read: > > "Time values ..., such as 05:00:00-03:00 and 10:00:00+02:00, ..." > > "23:00:00-03:00 and 02:00:00Z" might be another useful example. We should consider this a formal editorial recommendation to the WG: Change the second paragraph of the second Note in 2.2.9.1 to read: "Time values with different time zone offsets that were identical in the 1.0 version of this specification, such as 23:00:00-03:00 and 02:00:00Z, or 05:00:00-03:00 and 10:00:00+02:00, are in this version of this specification equal (because they begin at the same moment on the time line) but are not identical (because they have and retain different time zone offsets)." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 17:37:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT