[Bug 6707] [Schema Comment] Erratum for lexical representation for positiveInteger

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6707





--- Comment #8 from jboyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>  2009-05-11 23:50:09 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The changes agreed upon at yesterday's call have been made in the status-quo
> version of the spec at
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.html
>   (member-only link)
> I have unilaterally applied the same wording change to the corresponding
> sentence in the description of negativeInteger (which must similarly be
> non-zero).
> Accordingly, I'm marking this issue resolved.  It would be helpful if John
> Boyer, as the originator of the issue, could close it to indicate your assent,
> or reopen it to indicate dissent.  If we don't hear otherwise from you in the
> next two weeks, we'll assume you are happy.

The wording itself looks good to me. 
I've noticed, though, that somehow this issue was tagged as a Schema 1.1 only
issue, whereas my original post [1] stated an erratum for Schema 1.0, which
would of course also need to be applied to 1.1.  This means that fixing only
1.1 does not fix [1].

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2009JanMar/0189.html

It's not clear how to change the status of the issue; I'll try a few more
things after committing this comment to see if the way to change the status
presents itself.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 23:50:19 UTC