- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:31:26 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6014 --- Comment #6 from John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> 2009-04-20 16:31:26 --- (In reply to comment #5) > The changes described in comment 4 have now been integrated > into the status-quo documents. It appears the amendment from comment #4 was not incorporated as stated (although the spirit appears the same, comment #4's amendment is clearer to me). The rest seems fine. > It's not clear if there is deterministic behavior in the Y case: both B and C > <override> A with conflicting specifications. I'm not clear how the logical grouping of A <override> B <override> C is forced to be A + (B + C) but I have to believe it for now. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 22:30:52 UTC