http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5023 --- Comment #15 from Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> 2009-04-15 16:34:08 --- (In reply to comment #14) > (However, the post you cite provides no evidence that XML Spy doesn't using > hashing or indexing to support xsl:key - it seems to be pure conjecture. Such > conjectures by users are often way off the mark, in my experience.) yes, i was simply guessing and made no systematic tests. the performance differences, however, were dramatic, so at least it is safe to say that something significant was going on (or going wrong), and that the implementation had some significant performance issues with the combination of XML/XSLT i was using. (i would still take a bet that i am right; but i probably shouldn't... :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 16:34:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT