http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4602 Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com --- Comment #10 from Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> 2009-04-15 15:43:53 --- Hmm. The proposed solution comes dangerously close to preventing validation using Notation in the context of some non-XSD specification. If, for example, RelaxNG were to invent its own syntax for refining XSD types, might it not be desirable to allow the same appeal to validation against Notation that is made in XSD structures? Noah -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:44:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT