http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4602 --- Comment #9 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2009-04-15 01:56:24 --- Points in comment 7 and 8 well taken. Here is a possible alternate wording. The status quo reads: It is an ˇerrorˇ for NOTATION to be used directly in a schema. Only datatypes that are derived from NOTATION by specifying a value for ˇenumerationˇ can be used in a schema. Change this to read: It is (with one exception) an ˇerrorˇ for NOTATION to be used directly to validate a literal as described in Datatype Valid (§4.1.4): only datatypes derived from NOTATION by specifying a value for ˇenumerationˇ can be used to validate literals. The exception is that in the derivation of a new type the literals used to enumerate the allowed values may be (and in the context of [XSD 1.1 Part 1: Structures] MUST be) validated directly against NOTATION; this amounts to verifying that the value is a QName and that the QName is the name of a NOTATION declared in the current schema. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 01:56:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT