http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5781 --- Comment #4 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2009-04-13 17:23:26 --- (In reply to comment #3) > It would be better to recast the definition for clarity to eliminate the "is > called", using the "the xxx is yyy" format as is used in the other three added > or deleted definitions. Assuming Sandy's objection is upheld, I suggest that the definition of qualified node set be: "[Definition:] The qualified node set is that subset of the ·target node set· for which all the {fields} evaluate to a node sequence one of whose members is an element or attribute node with a ·non-absent· [schema actual value]." -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 17:23:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:17 GMT